the denominator of a rational number is greater than its numerator by 4. if 3 subtracted from the numerator and 4 added to the den

the denominator of a rational number is greater than its numerator by 4. if 3 subtracted from the numerator and 4 added to the denominator, the new number becomes 2/13. find the original number

pls tell me the ans of this 🙁

About the author
Caroline

2 thoughts on “the denominator of a rational number is greater than its numerator by 4. if 3 subtracted from the numerator and 4 added to the den”

  1. ________________________

    GiveN :-

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    • The denominator of a rational number is greater than its numerator by 4. If 3 subtracted from the numerator and 4 added to the denominator, the new number becomes 2/13

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    To FinD :-

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    • The original number.

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    SolutioN :-

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    Let the numerator be x and denominator be 4+x

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \qquad \quad : \implies \sf\dfrac{(x – 3)}{(4 + x) + 4} = \dfrac{2}{13} [/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \qquad \qquad : \implies \sf{ \dfrac{(x – 3)}{(8 + x)} = \dfrac{2}{13} }[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \quad \quad : \implies \sf{13(x – 3) = 2(8 + x)}[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \qquad \quad : \implies \sf{13x – 39 = 16 + 2x}[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \qquad \quad : \implies \sf{13x – 2x = 16 + 39}[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \quad \qquad : \implies \sf{11x = 55}[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \qquad \qquad : \implies \sf{x = \dfrac{ 55}{11} }[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \qquad \qquad : \implies \sf{x = 5}[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    ______________________________

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    We also know that :-

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \qquad \quad \begin{gathered}{ \boxed{ \underline{ \bf{ \red{Numerator = x = 5}}}}} \end{gathered}[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \qquad \qquad \begin {gathered}{ \boxed{ \underline{ \bf{ \red{Denominator = 4 + x = 4 + 5 = 9}}}}} \end{gathered}[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    ________________________________

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \begin{gathered}{ \boxed{ \underbrace{ \sf{ \blue{Therefore, \: the \: fraction \: is \: \frac{5}{9} }}}}} \end{gathered}[/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    [tex] \: \: [/tex]

    _________________________

    Reply
  2. [tex] \\ \underline\red{\rm \large{Answer :- }}[/tex]

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \:\: \: \: \: \: \: \: \implies \: \dfrac{25}{29} \\ [/tex]

    [tex] \\ \underline\red{\rm \large{Solution :- }}[/tex]

    Let the numerator be x .

    So, the denominator of rational number is greater than its numerator by 4.

    Then denominator be (4+x)

    Now, According to the question

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \implies \: \dfrac{(x – 3)}{(4 + x) + 4} = \dfrac{2}{3} \\ [/tex]

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \implies \: \dfrac{(x – 3)}{(8+ x) } = \dfrac{2}{3} \\ [/tex]

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \implies \:3 {(x – 3)} = 2{(8+ x)}\\ [/tex]

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \implies \:3x – 9= 16+ 2x \\ [/tex]

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \implies \:3x – 2x= 16+ 9 \\ [/tex]

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \implies \: x= 16+ 9 \\ [/tex]

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \implies \boxed{ \pink{\frak{\: x= 25}}} \\ [/tex]

    Now , We know that

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: Numerator \: = x \: = 25 \\ [/tex]

    [tex] \\ \sf \: \: \: \: \: Denominator = 4 + x \\ \: \sf \: \: \: \: \: \:\: \: \: \: \: \: \: \:\: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = 4 + 25 \\ \: \sf \: \: \: \: \:\: \: \: \: \: \: \: \:\: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: = \underline\pink{29} \\ [/tex]

    [tex] \\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \green{ \sf \: \: \: So, \: The \: fraction \: is \: \: \dfrac{25}{29} .}[/tex]

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Rylee Cancel reply