Answer: Using Euclid division lemma Step-by-step explanation: Let n, n+1 & n+2 be three consecutive positive integers. We know that n is of the form 3q,3q+1 or, 3q+2 (As per Euclid Division Lemma), So, we have the following Case I When n=3q; In this case, n is divisible by 3 but n+1 and n+2 are not divisible by 3. Case II When n=3q+1 In this case, n+2=3q+1+2=3(q+1) is divisible by 3 but n and n+1 are not divisible by 3. Case III When n=3q+2 In this case, n+1=3q+1+2=3(q+1) is divisible by 3 but n and n+2 are not divisible by 3. Hence one of n,n+1 and n+2 is divisible by 3. Reply
Answer:
Using Euclid division lemma
Step-by-step explanation:
Let n, n+1 & n+2 be three consecutive positive integers.
We know that n is of the form 3q,3q+1 or, 3q+2 (As per Euclid Division Lemma),
So, we have the following
Case I
When n=3q;
In this case, n is divisible by 3 but n+1 and n+2 are not divisible by 3.
Case II
When n=3q+1
In this case, n+2=3q+1+2=3(q+1) is divisible by 3 but n and n+1 are not divisible by 3.
Case III
When n=3q+2
In this case, n+1=3q+1+2=3(q+1) is divisible by 3 but n and n+2 are not divisible by 3.
Hence one of n,n+1 and n+2 is divisible by 3.