Substituting the value of p² from the equation (i).
→ 5q² = 25m²
→ q² = [tex] \sf {\dfrac{25}{5} } [/tex]m²
→ q² = 5m²
We get that 5 is a factor of q². So,
→ 5 is a factor of q.
5 is a factor of both p and q. This contradicts the assumption that p and q have no common factor. We get that our assumption is wrong. So, √5 can’t be a rational number. Hence, √5 is an irrational number.
By using the process of contradiction,
Let us assume that √5 is a rational number. Then,
[tex] \longrightarrow \sf { \sqrt{5} = \dfrac{p}{q} } [/tex]
Here, p and q are integers that haven’t common factor and q ≠ 0.
Now, squaring both sides.
[tex] \longrightarrow \sf { {(\sqrt{5})}^2 = { \bigg ( \dfrac{p}{q} \bigg ) }^{2} } [/tex]
[tex] \longrightarrow \sf { 5 = \dfrac{ {p}^{2} }{ {q}^{2} } } [/tex]
[tex] \longrightarrow \sf { 5 \times {q}^{2}= {p}^{2} } [/tex]
[tex] \longrightarrow \sf { 5{q}^{2}= {p}^{2} } [/tex]. . . . . ( equation 1 )
→ 5 is a factor of p². So,
→ 5 is a factor of p.
Now, let p = 5m for some natural number m. So,
→ p = 5m
→ p² = (5m)²⠀⠀⠀⠀(Squaring both sides)
→ p² = 25m²
Substituting the value of p² from the equation (i).
→ 5q² = 25m²
→ q² = [tex] \sf {\dfrac{25}{5} } [/tex]m²
→ q² = 5m²
We get that 5 is a factor of q². So,
→ 5 is a factor of q.
5 is a factor of both p and q. This contradicts the assumption that p and q have no common factor. We get that our assumption is wrong. So, √5 can’t be a rational number. Hence, √5 is an irrational number.
Hence, proved!
Step-by-step explanation:
aajao g i r l
trt-fbqr-tgj
Jo dikhane me interested ho